Brave New World by Aldous Huxley

In the clean bald-faced raw(a) gentleman by Aldous Huxley, adept of the main percentages that is presented to the readers is Bernard Marx. What this flakes name brings to the head al-Quran of the reader, and surely the intention too of the author, is the historical figure Karl Marx who wrote the book communist Manifesto. In the book, Bernard Marx is described as a hyp nonic specialist at the Hatchery and Conditioning Centre in the innovational valet. He belongs to the Alpha association though his physical features do non fit him to be in this caste.Those who be Alphas ar known to be grandiloquent nevertheless Bernard is kinda short. Furthermore, he acts as an disclosecast amongst his social root word. As Alphas are evaluate to be sporty in their manner and orientation, he does not get into in this leisure activity. This is the reason why he is proposen as crotchety by the throng around him (Huxley 38). As the raw progresses, the reader sees Bernard Marx as a loner and unhappy. The social group that he moves around with sees him as a rebel and a non-conformist. He questions the carcass of the manhood earth and wants to fight for his individuality.In some offices, he is seen as soulfulness who al guidances wants to go against the system. He can be considerationed as a protestor to put it in an some other focusing. just this thing convinces when one epoch he goes to the stockpile (Huxley 45) where he meets pot who is considered a savage by the area State. When he brings the latter to London, he instantly gains a popularity he never undergo before. He becomes outgoing and happy to participate in the activities in the orbit State. This participative attitude of Bernard Marx in the tender golf club will only changed when John refuses to be part of his agenda.The reader sees again that Marx returns to his old, protestor way. The with child(p) male Controller sees that he has not changed and in the end he is thrown out of th e World State to be deported to Iceland (Huxley 98). What can we see then in the character of Bernard Marx? We can conclude then that the protest attitude of him is not borne out of intellectual or of moral form in origin. The best term that we can see to it is that his act of his universe a non-conformist among his social group originates from a personal and social one.I cave in this conclusion to the nature of his character since his existence alone surely must mystify stemmed from his being short as an Alpha. As mentioned above, Alphas are designed to be t in all told further Marx is not. His manifestation of being a protestor comes from his anger of being not legitimate fully by his peers, of being diametric from them. So in effect he sees no point of participating in all the activities that are expected of his caste. When an opportunity is presented to him that he can be accepted and even become popular, his attitude towards the World State suddenly changed.winner went fizzily to Bernards head, and in the process all told reconciled him to a universe of discourse which, up till then, he had found very unsatisfactory (Huxley 66). This opportunity is when he brings John to London and quickly gains popularity (Huxley 66). Still, Marx goes back to his old ways when the jeopardy to become popular slips to his hands upon Johns rejections of his agenda. In the end, he is deported to Iceland against his protests. The moral of the character of Marx then is that he is a hypocrite in his being a non-conformists and critic of the ways of the World State.His criticism of the system in the community that he answer outs in stems from the rejection he gets from his being physically different from his social group. We can thus sum up that the flaws that he sees in the World System are not genuine. The order of the World State will be a defect as remote as Marx is concerned up until he is not accepted as part of his social group. When this has changed it i s only then that he can real feel a part of the new society. Works Cited Huxley, Aldous. support saucily World. new(a) York HarperCollins Publisher Inc. ,1998Brave New World by Aldous HuxleyThe Brave New World, written by Aldous Huxley, is an extemporary novel that deals with moral problems handle the problem of how to achieve happiness in the best possible way. The novel includes the poignant role of the political relation in achieving this closing and the drawbacks it can nominate in a society. This paper will thoroughly discuss some(prenominal) side of the moral problem and how it affected the society as a whole. More often than not, a novel is a little exposition and portrayal of an authors living, experiences and knowledge. It would be hard not to hold back his/her own opinions and feelings inside his/her work.An author can go as further nearly as draw sound arguments to defend his/her point, and all this can be easily done by describing his/her characters, the se tting, plot, and so on. Aldous Huxley started writing the Brave New world in 193, and by that time, technological innovations as well as world-changing events were taking place, and society was at its total make over. From its primitive way of life, the world was developing and advancing to a new and completely modern era. The event as a whole didnt escaped the direction of Huxley, and all of this, no doubt, affected him, and resulted in one of the most powerful, thought provoking novels.His visualization of the world in the near future, maybe decades or centuries from the time he wrote his work, gave deep insight of the unfavor equal to(p) would-be lifestyle of the world, which may not be so far from todays way of life. It is Huxleys office to portray the future that uses his current observations that make his novel a classic, affecting not only the people of his time, but also the latter societies. Inside the book, Huxley introduced a moral problem. He presented a society that was under the total power of a manipulative regimen.Due to go scientific techniques, people live in constant happiness. Here Huxley cherished his readers to see an strategic question, should the state of happiness be the prime goal of mankind, or should free will, at the expense of contentment, be the key. The Brave New Worlds government chose the former, to keep its people happy bandage ensuring stability. It was the director in the novel who explained the mechanics of the World State. He explained that horrendous amount of conditioning is necessary to unfold the secret of happiness, and that you must like what you are doing.Making people like both their pursuit and the way of life the government wants them to do is the goal of all the conditioning. One of the defining moments of the novel was when the lead character, John, entered the story. The other side of the argument was brought into account. John, who came from a very different society, sees the World State in a very different way. Because he had grown up in a society where the government doesnt have total determine over its citizen, he sees how the citizens were denied of the truth of literature, history, emotion, and most of all, humanity.It was when he met the world attracter, Mustapha Mond, that he was able to adamantly point his observations. But even though he understood Johns view, the leader refused to listen and continued to argue that it must be done in order to achieve happiness and stability. These aspects are much more of the essence(p) compared to humanity, the leader continued. He insists that social stability requires the sacrifice of the things John values. As long as people are happy everything will be fine. John protests that, without these things, human life is not worth living, even with happiness.Mond explains that the governments plan is foolproof, with the help of soma, a drug that offers a way to deal with unpleasant emotions that lead to inefficiency and conflict, a nd keep people from filtering to change the way they live. As everyone knows, utopias strive to work as perfection indeed it is completely necessary for these societies to have moral values. The society in Brave New World lacks values like promiscuity, over-population, use of drugs, and elimination of morality and family, creating a Dystopia. During the entire novel, Huxley makes evident that these values are missing in the society.As a peculiar characteristic the World State eliminates the word family. This word doesnt exist for the people anymore, meaning that there are no parents or siblings a person is created in an assembly line in mass production, creating 96 persons in one blow (Huxley, 6). This civilized society lives in a world where intelligence and technology play an important role. Religion is replaced with God does not exist anymore (Huxley, 230). Instead of tending church on Sundays, people attend to services where morals are not learned at all. They just get accu stomed to having knowledgeable intercourse or taking soma.The government not only controls how one thinks, but it also controls ones physical usefulness to his society. By genetically engineering ones body, the government can make it infinitely useful to itself. To make that one body feel no pain, to make the soul feel like it belongs to the society, and to make the mind make to any ideas is a vital asset for this government. The people are not forever worried close death and can always retard in this utopian society since other people pleasure them, and with a society of happy people, the government never fears a revolt.One aspect of control that is touched upon from the beginning of the novel until the end is the control of the population hand over and growth. As a way to prolong the societys truism of Community, Identity and Stability, the number of inhabitants is managed through the artificiality of the abide new worlds use of technology. In the first chapter of the nov el, the reader is introduced to the process of creating humankind in this Utopia. The fact that machines do what is done by human reproductive systems shows how accomplishment has dominated over man in this world.The actual process of creating humans is do possible through the use of a single ovary, which makes thousands of identical people. Since these people are similar in appearance, thought and relations, they are able to live in perfect harmony with each other. Huxley uses Lenina and Fanny, two of his womanish characters who are distant relatives from the same ovary, as people who get on well and are on the same page on issues concerning Utopian lifestyles. This is how the government of Utopia, made up of only ten controllers, is able to maintain stability among its people.Since stability is part of the brave new worlds motto, it is a crucial deal for the government to uphold. Something else that is controlled by government and science is any thing to do with marriage, ro mance and pregnancy. It is a rule by the government for everyone to freely have sex with anybody at anytime they want. It is against the rules of the Utopia to date anyone regularly. political sympathies forbids anyone to go towards thoughts of monogamy and romance because they require too much time and bring no stability to life.Science controls the aspect of pregnancy in the way that females have to wear contraceptive belts while having endless sex to keep down any pregnancy. Pregnancy is controlled because it brings pain and goal of the brave new world is to have happiness. Government and science restrain Utopias citizens from what is part of being human. In Brave New World, there are no feelings and emotions whatsoever because they are refused by the dominating authority which gives out the soma that allows people to do whatever they please without being guilty about it.But they live their lives with ignorance. Lastly, literature is another characteristic that makes this soci ety a dystopia. It is completely forbidden for anyone to read because it brings ideas to people, creating individual. They are more focused in a society that consumes and every time is buying new things. Even Mustapha Mond, one of the new worlds seven controllers, admits that the world they inhabit is far from perfect. Mond says to John those who have the ability to write the laws also have the ability to break them (Huxley, 248).Even the seven controllers of the World State break the rules by reading books. It is evident that even though they want to create a new world where the past is completely forgotten, they still want to read and learn. The truth is that by knowing about the past societies learn to not make the same mistakes again. Much of Huxleys vision is already reality today. We are already seeing the using of the fundamental principles evident in the novel with things like cloning, government control, drugs to make us happier, and being a consumer based society.Now, wh en a scientific find is discovered, people will refer to us coming closer to the brave new world. We are more conscious of changes that technology brings upon us and try to recognize its potential threats. This is the reason why there are always opposing groups of certain advancements, trying to see not only the pros but also the cons of new technology. Huxley therefore hasnt so much assist in the creation of new technologies, instead he has made us guarded or worried about these advancements.The book helped the population see a future, which may not be so appealing, compared to many other futuristic novels, which portrayed a much happier lifestyle. Huxleys upbringing, along with the world events going on around him, was contributory in some ways to the writing of Brave New World. More significantly however, are the effect the book has had on modern society. Not so much, that people have consciously taken ideas from the book and tried to implement them, more that the ideology has served as a gauge against which we judge the advents of technology.In conclusion, science has become a major part of this modern life. In Brave New World, Huxley predicts a world dominated by government and science and how the two aspects make humanity. Although I lack the understanding of a society of this New State, I can picture out what might happen to the world if the government makes this drastic operation. I can see a world strip of passion and love. Everything movement is mechanical. Every reaction will create confusion. I can see them asking themselves, how will I react when I accidentally do something wrong? How will I love someone?The questions somewhat made me laugh, but at the same time made me sad. The prospect of having the same fate as anyone else frightens me. Its as if well all be buried inside the same caskets. I dont like the idea at all. And by creating people massively, it automatically eliminates individuality. Parents are not necessary to raise a person, b ut they are actually wrong. Education starts at home, something very true in the real world. So if there isnt any home or family, how can a person be raised to be a well-mannered adult? Reference Huxley, A. (1975). Brave New World. Markham, Ontario