An Analysis of Jack Londons To Build A Fire :: London To Build a Fire Essays

An Analysis of Jack Londons To name A FireCharles E. May, Author of the article To Build A Fire Physical Fiction and Metaphysical Critics was giving his psychological criticism on the Jack London short story. May was elaborating on the naturalistic port of domain versus nature when it comes to survival. Mays article suggests that the champion in the story did not only have a psychological discovery but a simple-minded physical discovery that self is body only(23). In the story, To Build A Fire, the protagonist has to judge that he was not invincible, but a human with a weakness. The man may have been psychologically apt in his ingest eye but weak against nature and the physical elements. The protagonist displayed defiance in authority when he laughed (152) at the advice of the Old-Timer on Sulphur Creek when he told him how cold it gets in the country. The protagonist felt he had everything under control when he made the first fire to keep warm in spite of the numbness of his fingers. The test of egos and wills began to surface when the man was crap to move on and the dog wanted to stay near the fire. However, just as there was no keen intimacy between the dog and the man(152) the dog would be the protagonist constant companion until the mans death. The man had to accept that the fire provider had failed(156) when he did not have control of his frozen fingers or the building of the fire. Nature had defeated him. The id in the protagonist wanted to kill the dog to keep himself warm. But the ego along with the mans inability to neither drop dead nor hold his sheath knife(157) caused him not to be able to kill the dog. The aura of death was prevalent. Realizing that he no longer had dominion over his own body as well as accepting his making a fool of himself(158) he had to accept the inevitable. Not only did he have to accept death, he had to acknowledge that the Old-Timer was right when warning him about traveling alone. Ironically, while the man was dyi ng, he was angry at the dog because of its natural warmth, instincts that he had, and the survival skills that the dog used.