The Cosmological Argument is Self-contradictory Essay -- Philosophy Rel

The Cosmological line of work, also known as the First Cause Argument, is one of the most important controversys for the innovation of God, not only be causal agent it is one of the more convincing, but also because it is one of the most used. The thought that everything that happens must cod a cause and that the showtime cause of everything must have been God, is widespread. The cosmological argument is the argument from the existence of the world or conception to the existence of a being that brought it into and keeps it in existence. The idea that the universe has an infinite past, stretching back in time into infinity is both philosophically and scientifically problematic. All indications are that there is a point in time at which the universe began to exist. This beginning was either caused or causeless. The cosmological argument takes the suggestion that the beginning of the universe was uncaused to be impossible. The idea of an uncaused even t is absurd nothing comes from nothing. The universe was therefore caused by something outside it. The cosmological argument thus confirms one element of Christianity, the doctrine of Creation. The Cosmological Argument ------------------------- (1) Everything that exists has a cause of its existence. (2) The universe exists. Therefore (3) The universe has a cause of its existence. (4) If the universe has a cause of its existence, then that cause is God. Therefore (5) God exists. This argument is subject to a simple objection, which arises in the form of the question Does God have a cause of his existence? Now the whole universe is a vast, interlocking chain of things that ... ... cosmological argument above. The Cosmological Argument doesntnecessarily have the qualities normally ascribed to God (omniscience, omnipotence, omnibenevolence) by the people who offer the argument in the first place (Christians, Jews, Muslims). The first cause/ cosmological argument states, Everything has a cause and every cause is the result of a previous cause. There must have been something to start off this chain of events, and that something is God. This argument is self-contradictory. The premise is that everything has a cause the conclusion is that something exists, namely God, which does not have a cause. If we are going to give up something to exist which is uncaused, it is much more sensible to say that the universe itself is uncaused than to assume the existence of God and say that God is uncaused.